Showing posts with label U.P. President. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U.P. President. Show all posts

Friday, August 5, 2011

U.P. President Pascual updates constituents on latest university developments

By Chanda Shahani

University of the Philippines President Alfredo E. Pascual talked today (August 5, 2011) about his vision for U.P.'s reinventing itself as a full-research university in light of massive budget cuts from the national government in 2012.

Speaking at the "Kapihan with UP President Alfredo Pascual," at 5:00 p.m. today at the Marine Science Institute at U.P. Diliman, with the overall topic, "Research for a better Philippines and ASEAN," Pascual said that he was at the House of Representatives yesterday when he received the bad news from Congressmen that not only would U.P.'s proposed budget be cut, but that it would be even smaller than in 2011.

He said that U.P.'s budget for 2012 would be cut by 800 million to PhP 5,149,619,000 from its figure of PhP 5,949,619,000 in 2011. U.P.'s budget, as well as the budgets of other state universities and colleges (SUCs) are currently lodged with the House Committee on Appropriations where they will undergo deliberations.

U.P.'s budget has been steadily shrinking over several years due to dwindling support from the national government and congress. For the Diliman Diary's analysis on U.P.'s budget cuts, please click here.

"We have ways of coping with this, but we will not sacrifice academic excellence," Pascual said, adding that "they cannot fault us if we contract our student body to retain excellence. I hope we will not reach that situation."

He said that in his original mission statement, he saw that U.P. had to strengthen its impact. In this regard, he said, research was a very important way for U.P. make itself a cut above the rest of the SUCs. However, U.P. had to strengthen its research capabilities, as development was uneven with some schools such as the Marine Science Institute (MSI) and other institutes in the sciences already well-experienced with research while others just remained as teaching schools, imparting existing knowledge without discovering new knowledge.

"Research and development (R&D) is primordial, he said, and acknowledged the ongoing online debate between former U.P. Visayas Chancellor Flor Lacanilao and former U.P. Diliman Chancellor Roger Posadas, both distinguished scientists, who have been debating what the national priority should be in terms of whether basic research will lead to technological progress (Lacanilao) or whether the selective acquisition of the chicken through the reengineering of existing technology as a way to jump start basic research (i.e., the egg) was the way to go (Posadas).

Pascual tacitly admitted that both scientists were correct in their respective arguments, and referred to U.P.'s collaboration with the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) to reverse engineer a monorail system within U.P. campus, while at the same time stressing that it was important for faculty and graduate students to get published in  ISI-referenced journals which were important as gauges of academic excellence.

He stressed that it was important for U.P. to start develop a strong cross-disciplinary capability such that different disciplines could work closely together. "If we just address the problem of the Philippines, we can still be globally relevant, because there are so many developing country and tropical issues that other countries will want to tap our expertise in," he said.

Dr. Edgardo D. Gomez, a Professor Emeritus of U.P. Diliman's Marine Science Institute (MSI) said in the open forum that “their experience could serve as a useful model for other units in the university”; even as U.P. struggles to retain its relevance amidst budget cuts from the national government. He said that President Benigno S. Aquino III is asking MSI to come out with a national coral reef protection program.

Being published in internationally-refereed journals by professors, researchers and graduate students will become the new norm in U.P.


Raul Suarez, a Canada-based Philippine researcher said in PhilScience, a group in Yahoo! Groups, that “The “push” for publication in ISI-indexed journals is a relatively recent phenomenon in the Philippines. As many are aware, the UP now gives its faculty a cash incentive for each ISI-journal article published and such publications are now required for tenure and promotion. In certain graduate programs, the publication of at least one paper in an ISI-indexed journal is a requirement for graduation with a Ph.D. degree.”

Dr. Gomez said that other units can learn from the early experiences of MSI where they learned early on to develop a “psycho-sociological mindset” that made publishing in internationally refereed journals quite natural. “In our case, it's not required to be published. Our experience is that “you come up with the data, you analyze it, and then you publish it,” he said.

The consensus among the forum participants was that the more U.P. research is published in internationally refereed journals, the better known U.P. will become internationally, and the more successful U.P. will be in attracting  funding for its proposals.

The open forum with President Pascual also revealed the following important insights:
  •  U.P. can continue to remain relevant by simply focusing on the broad themes of the Millenium Development Goals (MDG) such as food security, nutrition, health, infectious diseases and climate change.
  • President Pascual said that an example of U.P. remaining relevant within the context of MDG was a proposal he received from Dr. Rex Victor O. Cruz, the dean of the College of Forestry and Natural Resourcesat U.P. Los Banos for Mt. Makiling to become a laboratory and a regional center for climate change.
  • U.P. is now working on a comprehensive communications plan, Pascual said. "U.P. has to get to be known to the rest of the country, as it has so many gems. We should also popularize our research findings in a language that the common man can understand," he said.
  • Undergraduate programs result in student enrollment in U.P. where undergraduates constitute 80% of the student population and graduate students constitute 20% of the student population. Pascual said that in more progressive countries, the ratio is 50% to 50%. Pascual said that he would like to see the ratio of graduate students reach 30% by the time his term ends.
  • More research is the only way for U.P. to distinguish itself. He said that he was in favor of putting up a research hospital in U.P. Diliman with a capacity of 300 beds which would differentiate itself from the historic mandate of Philippine General Hospital (PGH). The proximity of the research hospital to the colleges such as the U.P. College of Engineering would enable the efficient interaction of the different disciplines in the testing of Philippine-made artificial heart valves or prosthetics, for example.
  • Pascual also said that the national government kept on asking U.P. to do research for it, but that U.P.'s overhead charge was only 5% to ten percent of the overall charges. He said that a more appropriate charge was 50%, which is what Harvard and other universities charge. He said that the funds collected from this would go to a pool of funds to support U.P.'s research projects.
  • While U.P. would still create "public goods" or the dissemination and creation of knowledge for the good of the community, U.P. also had to engage in commercialization. "Ultimately is the creation of new industries in the country from the creation of research output," Pascual said.
  • Some examples of successful commercialization was the PhP 100 million in revenues U.P. Los Banos dervied from its biofertilizer project and PhP 45 million which U.P. Manila will receive in partnership with Pascual Laboratories for its Lagundi project.
(Chanda Shahani is the editor of the Diliman Diary. An A.B. Comparative Literature graduate from U.P. Diliman, he also has a Master's degree in Entrepreneurship from the Asian Institute of Management and is a former business page reporter for the Philippine STAR).

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Commentary: Outgoing Roman Administration parties hard even as U.P.'s 2011 budget cut leaves it twisting in the wind

Despised greatly in his day, Emperor Nero
is shown here fiddling as Rome burns in A.D. 64
(Source: http://tinyurl.com/69msulk)

Talk about fiddling while Rome burns.

Even as the University of the Philippines continues to reel from a massive budgetary shortfall in 2011 engineered by the administration of President Benigno S. Aquino III, outgoing U.P. President Emerlinda R. Roman, accompanied by 20 U.P. System officials from Manila will be feted on February 4, 2011 in a testimonial ceremony at U.P. Mindanao, at taxpayer's expense.

An embedded source said that the cost of the festivities is expected to reach PhP 100,000.00 alone for President Roman's testimonial ceremony. The source said the U.P. System officials are billeted in Davao City's Marco Polo Hotel.

To put it bluntly, this is nothing short of obscene. But perhaps this amount is peanuts for U.P. Mindanao Chancellor Gilda Rivero, who hosts the ceremony, which is an overall part of U.P. Mindanao's 16th Anniversary Celebration. Chancellor Rivero is perhaps best known for her 2007 expenditure of PhP 643,800.67  for her 2007 investiture ceremonies which was criticized by COA (see: http://diliman-diary.blogspot.com/2010/09/commission-on-audit-criticizes-up.html).

Chancellor Rivero, however, has appealed COA's report, and no known final ruling yet exists on the matter.

The U.P. Mindanao schedule of festivities is embedded below:

(To enlarge the graphic, just click on it
Source: http://www.upmin.edu.ph/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=623:february-2011-16th-anniversary-of-up-mindanao&catid=1&Itemid=19)

But the February 4 festivities will not yet be the end of the Outgoing Roman Administration's hard-partying ways, fueled by tax monies collected from millions of diligent and hard-working Filipinos. On February 9, 2011, 7:30 pm at U.P. Diliman's University Theater there will be a gala night to bid goodbye and good night to U.P. President Emerlinda R. Roman.

The next day, or on February 10, 2011, Incoming U.P. President Alfredo E. Pascual starts his first day of work. We have higher expectations of Mr. Pascual, and will be covering his six-year term with great interest.

(By the Diliman Diary staff)

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Systemwide Student Leaders Convention with President-elect Pascual Updates by UPV-USC Rep. Liezyl Ann Gomez

Editor's note: The following Facebook post by Kristian Jacob Abad Lora was posted on the Facebook page of Incoming University of the Philippines (U.P.) President Alfredo E. Pascual, and is a narration of a live update by incumbent UP Visayas-UP Cebu College Representative to UP University Student Council Liezyl Ann Gomez on a visit of Systemwide student leaders with Mr. Pascual last January 23.

Mr. Pascual's six-year term as U.P. President starts on February 10, 2011, replacing Outgoing U.P. President Emerlinda R. Roman, who will resume her teaching position as a professor at the College of Business Administration at U.P. Diliman

By Kristian Jacob Abad Lora on Sunday, January 23, 2011 at 8:52pm

Sa lahat ng mga Iskolar, Guro, at Kawani ng Bayan, narito ang ilan sa mga importanteng pahayag ng ating bagong pangulong si President-elect Alfredo Pascual sa Systemwide Student Leaders Convention with President-elect Pascual, Enero 23, kanina.

"Unang-una ang UP ay public university, and we have to protect its public character."

"I will not agree to the budget cut and I will raise protest against it."

"No military presence in UP campuses."

Magaganda at promising nga ang mga naging pahayag ni G. Pascual sa kumbensyon. Sana'y magpatuloy siyang maging kakampi nating lahat at hindi lang ng iilan. Sana'y patuloy siyang kaakibat natin sa pag-uphold ng demokrasya sa loob ng pamantasan at sa pag-uphold "public character" ng Unibersidad ng Pilipinas bilang Unibersidad ng at para sa Bayan.

Padayon lalo na sa ating pagmamatyag! SERVE THE PEOPLE! GOD BLESS! ^^,

Credits to the incumbent UP Visayas-UP Cebu College Representative to UP University Student Council Liezyl Ann Gomez for the live update.

upissues.wordpress.com: Bakit si Alfredo Pascual ang Ibinoto ng Staff Regent Para U.P. President?

ni Kgg. Clodualdo “Buboy” Cabrera

Staff Regent

Ang aking pagboto kay G. Alfredo Pascual ay nakabatay sa mga pinagkaisahan at pinagkasunduan sa ginanap na Systemwide Sectoral Conference noong Setyembre 2 at 3, 2010 na ginanap sa UP SOLAIR at dinaluhan ng iba’t ibang kinatawan mula sa sektor ng estudyante, guro, REPS, at administratibong kawani, gayundin sa mga nakalap na mungkahi sa aking ginawang pag-iikot sa iba’t ibang kampus.

Ang pangkalahatang pamantayan na napagkaisahan ay ang sumusunod:

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Diliman Diary readers respond to "A letter from a UPCM alumnus to incoming U.P. President Pascual on less Antiquated Teaching Methods

Editor's note: Two Diliman Diary Readers have already responded to the email sent to us on January 16 by Dr. Leonardo Leonidas, a member of the U.P. Medical Society in America (UPMASA) regarding antiquated teaching methods at the University of the Philippines (please see: http://diliman-diary.blogspot.com/2011/01/editors-note-following-was-emailed-to.html) but for the original consumption of incoming U.P. President Alfredo E. Pascual. The original email seems to have acquired a life of its own, however due to reader interest in the subject. We are including both emails below. The first is from Dr. Gabriel G. Carreon and the second is from Mr. Romeo Santos, who sent us a comment to our Facebook page at: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Diliman-Diary/107709502591529

The first email:

Dear Dr. Leonidas,

I was pleased to read your article of 17 January 2011 in the Diliman Diary on improving teaching methods. Congratulations! The essence of learning are curiosity and initiative, among others. I would like to complement your experience with some observations and comments.

[1] There appears to be a revival on the fundamentals of a good physical examination – inspection, palpation, percussion and auscultation. There should be equal re-focus on good history-taking.

[2] Some U.S. medical schools are introducing the patient to the student as early as the first year; as well, the student is being introduced to the community early in the medical course. This should help in the early development of a social conscience in addition to a scientific mind.

[3] There is a pressing need for the early introduction of the student to the realities of the health care system where he will apply his medical knowledge, participate in organization, teamwork and networking and learn to prioritize decisions and actions.

[4] There is a need to learn to translate thoughts and words into action and to look for reasonable outcomes from available inputs and resources.

We hope these will be helpful to the UPCM.


Gabriel G. Carreon
UPCM 1953.

The second email:

You hit it bulls-eye, Prof. Leonidas! I appreciate your insights.

Yes, there must be a 'radical' change in the way instructions are done in UP- actually, it should be in the whole country. I agree with your 'evidence-based education', it's actually our 'results-based' advocacy, in which performance and success are measured not only by outputs, but more on outcomes.

I think it's an issue of pedagogy -why the professor you mentioned teaches the way he does. Most professors still stick to the pedagogic approach of 'transmission' and not 'transformation'. Transmission makes one professor think that students are just receiving vessels, that teachers are ‘know-all’ lords in the classroom, and what students shall do is to absorb, absorb, and absorb from the ‘most-knowing’ being. What makes it worse is that what students absorb is usually knowledge that the profs have accumulated through books (grey literature, mostly) and the lessons, styles, and mindsets, among many, were the same worn-out stuffs handed down to them by their own mentors. Transmission treats students as fraternity applicants that are under-going initiation, -that because profs have experienced ‘difficult life’ under their ‘masters’, it’s now their turn to get even.

On the other hand, transformation recognizes that students are partners in learning, that education is not a one-way process –both sides should learn from the teaching endeavor, and profs and students have equal stake in the learning initiative. Actually, the basic reason for education is to make one a well-rounded individual - one who is ‘changed’ for the better, not just for the betterment of himself, but the society. That is the very ‘LOGIC [THEORY] OF CHANGE’ central in any educational program. Otherwise, if the products of learning are individuals that have one-track mind and a narrow sense of learning (solidly focused on the technical, field or discipline-fixed application of the knowledge learnt), that he will use for self gratification and not for the common good, then the society will suffer disastrously. Learning outcomes (as measurable results) are evident in students who undergo education if they imbibe the values on which this education is basically premised. That is what we call evidence-based learning. If the purpose of the education is to produce individuals who are more concerned with becoming cum laude, board topnotcher, ‘crema del crème’ and to just graduate to advance own selves, then education is mere output-based.

It is no wonder why we always lament the fact that while, we, Filipinos are known to be intelligent people, we, as a society, do not progress much. My theory is that our education is basically flawed. It is very output-oriented and not what you said as ‘evidence-based’ or ‘results based’. We are turning out graduates who are mostly ‘parroting’ what their teachers did (and what these teachers had become), more often, self-centered and narrowly focused on the technical skills and knowledge of their disciplines, while evidence of values imbibed for the common well-being and upliftment of the collective whole are absent.

Have we ever asked ourselves?-WHY is corruption so selfish? ...When do we ever learn? - EDUCATION is not rote, it should be built around values that advance common good, and these values should be evident outcomes seen in the students we produce.



Romeo Santos

Monday, January 17, 2011

A letter from a UPCM alumnus to incoming U.P. President Pascual on less Antiquated Teaching Methods

Editor's note: The following email was sent to us on January 16 by Dr. Leonardo Leonidas, a member of the U.P. Medical Society in America (UPMASA) with the request that we upload this for the possible consideration of the incoming U.P. President Alfredo E. Pascual. We are also posting this on the Facebook page entitled, Messages to new U.P. President Alfredo E. Pascual at: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Messages-to-New-UP-President-Alfredo-E-Pascual/172909116063538 
Dr. Leonidas may be reached for comment at: nonieleonidas68@gmail.com

To the New UP President Mr. Alfredo E. Pascual,

Changing Old Teaching Method
One day last February at one in the afternoon, I attended a lecture at UPCM, BSLR room, 42 years after my graduation. The topic was muscle diseases. The professor I think was in the mid 40s. 
Except for the use of Power Point, the format of the talk was similar to my experience when I was student. It was a “show-and-tell” one-way talk with the professor doing all the action. 
The lecture was just as boring and sleep inducing like we had years ago. I was sitting in the front first row. I looked back to my right and noticed that some of the students are bored and sleepy. During our time, I remembered I also felt sleepy in many of the lectures at the same lecture room. 
After about half an hour of the talk, I left the room because I did not see any new teaching method from the professor that I can adopt.
I am Leonardo Leonidas, UPCM class 68 graduate, Assistant Clinical Professor in Pediatrics (till 2008), Tufts University School of Medicine. Boston. For about 30 years I mentored third year medical students. My role was to teach and demonstrate to how to diagnose, do physical examination, and treat patients.
I think the problem of our University is we have antiquated method of teaching which was designed during the industrial age. Our teaching methods are  experienced base, rather than “Evidence Based Education” like the new wave in medical education’s “Evidenced Based Medicine.”
I think the teaching model of most Professors is “One-Size-Fit-All” one-way lectures. They have different mind-set that strongly believe they should teach the Net Generation Student Learners the same way they learned.  
However, the Net Gen Student Learners grew up in a digital world of the 21st Century with a different mind-set who gets sleepy easily with a boring one-way lecture even though they are using Power Point.
Our student of the 21st century prefers to discover for themselves the solutions to a problem. They are more comfortable searching for the answer rather than Professor lecturing to them subjects that they are not interested with at that particular time.
The Net Gen Students are better in collaborating with other students or teachers. They learn better creating their own learning environment using technology and less of the paper-based note-taking, reading heavy hard copy books.
However, if our University is not offering tools and opportunities for collaboration, just-in-time learning, rapid on-line 24/7 libraries, these students will be bored and stressed on graduation. I think these are the student when they become professionals might be prone to early burn-out, reduced productivity, depression, and probably prone to corruption at the workplace.
How can we help the 21st century Learners?
We should change our methods of teaching. We should make it Student-Centric and Fun. And these are the features of newer teaching method:
    Instead of Professors lecturing, they should interact with students and help them discover for themselves.
    Instead of delivering a “One-Size-Fits-All” form of lecture, Professors should customize learning module to fit the student’s way of learning and studying.
    Instead of isolating the students to work alone, the Professor should encourage them to collaborate with other students, teachers, business managers, and researchers.
    Instead of teaching them what to learn, Professors should teach them how to think for themselves and do extensive research to solve a particular problem at hand.
    Instead of loading their power point slides with words, they should put more cartoons, pictures, and videos to illustrate the main idea. The brain learn and remember more visually.
   Instead of being serious in their demeanor, Professors should smile more, make frequent eye-contact with some students, give one-liner jokes, or show magic to make the amygdala pay attention. 
   Instead of forgetting the names of their students,
teachers should request their student’s e mail, so communication and teaching will be easier and fun. With a group e mail, teachers can follow up their students and make outcome studies of their methods. Updates of their lecture can be distributed with a click of the mouse. Armed with e mails, teachers can easily hook up a student with researchers and future contacts for employment.
    
I suggest that the first step for UP to help to the Net Gen Learner is to make all of the lectures available in a Website, a Blog from each Professor, group e mail, Facebook, or an Apple App. Professor should have a recorded audio or video of their lectures available 24/7 wireless.
I think one of the best tool that helped my students is the e mail. With this tool, I created cases of typical patients for them to solve within a few days. I requested students to analyze the case then send me their diagnosis. The response and comments were positive. And my Tufts medical students enjoyed it. 
From that experience, about five years before I retired, I invited some third year students from UP College of medicine for an e mail discussion on selected pediatric patients. About 20 of them was in my e mail group. One of them e mailed me saying that he learned more from our long-distance discussion than his six-weeks of rotation at the Pediatric Department of PGH. This student later on was accepted at Johns Hopkins Training program and now a Fellow at Mayo Clinic.
I also created a website that my students can visit to look for differential diagnosis in diseases of children. Instead of my students going to a textbook to look for the many causes of headache, fever, abdominal pain, etc., they just visit my website and with a few click of the mouse, they have at least 20 causes of whatever chief complaint of a patient they are dealing with.
Students will not be required to attend lectures, but will be required to learn in small groups and collaborate with other students or researchers. Instead of taking multiple-choice examinations for their “grades”, students should have a portfolio of their work that can help the community.
Since paper based text-books are often at least three to five years late, there will less hard-copy books but more e-books for technical, biological, health, and sciences. 
However, we should design an outcome-based learning environment. Before one student can go to the next level, he or she should demonstrate that the teaching module is well ingrained in their brain and attitude. That they can remember and apply the principles in their daily life or environment.
The goal of a Student-Centric education is founded on Evidence Based Medicine "Just-in-Time" to be used to solve the current problem.
Lastly, I think all student should have a mandatory course on how the brain works, remember, and decide based on the pre-frontal cortex, not on the amygdala, the emotional center. They should also know the latest research on how to motivate ourselves and others based on the research of Harry Harlow and Edward Deci.
This 21st Century Education is now possible and the University of the Philippines should be the first Institution to morph into it.
The University of the Philippine has already selected its next President. I suggest the next one use Evidence Based Teaching methods and create a master’s degree program about how the brain works as applied to teaching.
Leonardo Leonidas, MD
Parent’s Diagnostic Aid (Apple App Store)
Assistant Clinical Professor in Pediatrics
Tufts University (Retired)
Outstanding Alumnus, UPMASA, 2010
Teacher of the Year, UPMASA, 2006
Distinguished Career In Teaching Award from Tufts University's Class 2009 Award Ceremony on May 13, 2009 at Parker House Hotel, Boston.
Email: nonieleonidas68@gmail.com