Why the government should continue increasing the UP Budget

By Chancellor Caesar
 Saloma

University
 of 
the 
Philippines 
Diliman 
26
 August 
2013

The
Philippine government, through the
Aquino 
administration, started to
 increase earnestly the
 budget
of the University of
the Philippines in
fiscal
year
2013.
It allocated Php10.09B
 which 
is
1.66 times
 more than the 2012 UP budget.
 The average
UP budget
 per year 
in the 
last
 ten
 years
 ending 2012 is
 Php5.63B.
 The UP budget
 was 
Php 4.34 B in 2003.

UP 
is
 the
 only
 national
 university
 of
 the
 country (Republic
 Act
9500). Its
 annual
 budget consists
 of
 three
 major expense categories: Personnel Services (PS),
 Maintenance,
 Operating
 &
Other Expenses (MOOE),
 and Capital
Outlay
 (CO).
 The PS allocation
 is used
 to pay for
 the 
salaries,
 wages
 and
 other
compensation
 of
 permanent,
 temporary,
 contractual
 and
 casual
employees
 while the
 MOOE is
 utilized to 
operate the 
seven
 (7)
constituent
 universities
 of
 UP and 
maintain
 its 
fifteen
 campuses.
 On 
the
 other
 hand, the
 CO
 allocation
 permits
 UP 
to
 purchase
goods 
and
 services 
as
 well
 as
 implement 
infrastructure projects
that
 add
 to
 its
 collection
 of assets.

 Included in
 the
 UP budget 
is
the
 allocation for the Philippine
 General
 Hospital (PGH).

The
 PS
 component
 of
 the
 2012
 UP 
budget
 was
 64.8% 
higher
than
 that
 in 
2008 
implying an
 annual
 average
 increase
 of
 16.2%
in 
the
 said span
 of
 time.
 The
 increases
 enabled
 UP to apply
 a
series
 of
 compensation
 adjustments 
for
 its
employees
 in  accordance
 with 
the 
Salary
 Standardization 
Law
 Policy
 of 
the
Philippine 
government.
  For
 example,
the
 full
 professor
 salary
(SG
29‐8) 
in
 2012
 was
 1.37
times
 higher
 than
 that
 in 
2010.
 For
associate
 (SG
25‐5)
 and
 assistant
 (SG
21‐5)
 professors,
 the
corresponding
 increases
 were
 1.32 
and
 1.2 times, respectively.


Better 
compensation 
is
 aimed 
at
 attracting
 and
 retaining
 highly
talented
 and
 productive
 scholars,
 scientists, researchers
 and
artists 
to 
serve
 in
 UP 
on 
a
 full‐time
 basis.
The
 PS 
component
 of
the
 2013
 UP
 budget
 is
 24.69% 
higher 
than
 in
 2012.

The
MOOE 
component 
is
 a
 distinctive
 feature 
of
 the
 2013
UP
budget.
 At
 Php2.06B, 
it is 2.88times 
larger 
than 
its 
2012
counterpart.
 The 
relative
 increase
 is
 even
 more telling
 at
 3.53 times
 when 
the MOOE
 allocation
 for
 the
 PGH
 is
 considered
separately.
 The 
average annual
 MOOE 
budget 
for
 UP 
is
Php785.655 M
 from 2003 
to 
2012.


In 
2012,
 UP
 Diliman,
 the
 main
 campus
 of 
UP,
 received 
an
MOOE
 allocation of
 Php 103.243 M
 which
 was
 highly
inadequate
 to 
cover
 the
 cost 
of 
energy 
and
 water
 consumption
 as
 well 
as
 security
 and
 janitorial
 services.
 The
 energy 
bill 
of
 UP
Diliman
 amounted 
to
 Php 193.203737 M,
 which
 is
 6.99%
 higher
than
 that
 in
 2011.

 Energy consumption 
increased
 by
 4.18%
primarily
 due 
to 
the
 completion
 of
 new
 buildings
 and
 facilities
particularly 
in 
the National Science
 Complex
 and 
the
Engineering
 Complex.

 The
 2012
 water
 bill
 was
 Php70.130146 M,
 which
 is
 8.74%
 lower 
than
 in 2011.
 Concerted
 efforts
 to
repair
 or 
replace leaking
 pipes
 and
 defective
 water
 fixtures
 have
 led
 to a noticeable
 21.95%
 reduction 
in water
 consumption
 in 
UP 
Diliman
 buildings.


The
 2013
 MOOE
 allocation
 of
 UP
 Diliman
is Php 268.983M, which
 is
 2.61 
times
 larger than
 in
 the
previous
 year.
 The
 said
amount however, is 
still
 not
 sufficient
 to cover the
 increasing
cost
 of 
energy
 and
 water
 consumption 
as 
well
 as
 security
 and
janitorial
 services
 that
 is projected 
to 
be 
at
 least 
Php 420M.


To
 bridge 
the
 gap
 between
 actual
 operations cost and
insufficient
 MOOE
 allotment
 from
 the
national
 government,
 UP
Diliman
 uses
 its
 income
 from tuition
fees
 and 
other
asset
utilization 
initiatives.
 Such
 a
 deficit‐funding
 scheme
however,
reduces
 the
 amount 
of
 money
 that
 is
 available
 for
 making
 the
campus
 more
 enabling
 and
 nurturing.

 It
 has
 postponed
 the
overdue
 rehabilitation/retrofitting
 of
 aging
infrastructures,
scaled
 down
 vital student
 support
 programs,
 and
 stymied
 the
acquisition
 of
 modern
 equipment
 and
 facilities that
 enhance
the safety
 and 
welfare 
of
 the 
UP
 community
 and
 the
 general 
public
that 
regularly 
spend 
time 
in 
the
 493‐hectare
 campus.

The
2013
 UP 
budget
 included
 a
 CO
 allocation
 of
 Php1.45 B
 –
none
 was
 allotted 
in
 the
 previous two
 years.
 In 
2012
however, UP, through
 the
 efforts
 of
 UP
 President
 Alfredo 
Pascual
 was
able
 to
 secure
 Php 1.3B
 from
 the
 Commission
 on
 Higher
Education (CHED) 
as part 
of
 the
 Disbursement
 Acceleration
Plan
 of
 Philippine President
 Aquino,
that enabled it 
to
implement
 new
 CO
 projects 
in
 its constituent universities.


For
 2014,
 UP
 has
 requested 
for 
a
 budget
 of
 Php17.1 B
 that
included
 funding
 proposals
 for 
major
 CO
 projects
 such
 as
 the
Sports
 Complex
 (Php435M), 
the
 College
 of Architecture
Complex 
(Php260.590M), 
the
 College
 of
 Home
Economics Complex
(Php 425M)
 and
 Vinzon’s
 Hall‐Student
Center
(Php100M)
 in UP
Diliman.
The
Executive Branch
 has
submitted
to
Congress
 a
 National
 Expenditure
 Program
 (NEP)
 for
 2014 
that
includes 
a
 UP
 Budget
 of
 Php
8.098 B
 of
 which
 Php1.991B
is
allotted
 for
 PGH.
 The
 UP
 Budget
 in
 the
 proposed
 2014
NEP
represents
 only
 47.36%
 of
 the
 amount
 that 
has been
 originally
requested.
 It 
features 
a
 proposed
 MOOE
 allocation
 that
 is
1.04%
 higher
 than
 in
2013 
and
 there 
is 
no
explicit
 CO
 budget
allocation.


The instruction 
is
 for UP
 to 
source
 the
 funds for its
 proposed
 CO 
projects
 separately from 
CHED. Investing
       seriously
 in
UP 
is
 a
 wise
 strategy
 for
 the 
Philippine
 government and the
country.
The
 infusion
 of 
public
 funds 
that
 permitted
 the
 on‐going
 completion
 of 
the
 National
 Science 
Complex and
t he
Engineering 
Complex, and
 increased
 the 
available
 number
of
graduate
 scholarships 
in
 the
 basic
 and
 applied
sciences,
mathematics
 and
 the
 engineering
 sciences, has
 already 
resulted
in
  meaningful
 human
 capital
 buildup
 in
 the
 form of
 more
 highly
 trained
 PhD
 and
 MS
 graduates.
 It
 has accelerated
 the
generation
 of
 new 
scientific
 knowledge,
 and
 advanced
 the 
development
 of
 technical
 expertise 
in
 critical areas
 of
 national 
importance
 such 
as
 weather
 forecasting,
 disaster 
risk
 response
and
 mitigation
 as
 well
 as
 terrestria l
and
 marine
 resource
management.



Other
 government
 agencies
 such
 as 
the
 DOST, CHED, DA, DENR, DOH, DA
 and
 DepEd as
 well
 as
 Congress
 and
 the
Judiciary
 continue
 to
 rely
 on 
the
 valuable
 expertise
 of
 UP
scholars
 and
 researchers
 in
 the formulation 
and
 implementation
 of
 their
respective
 programs 
and 
projects.

 State
universities
 serve 
about 
a 
third
 of
 all 
college
 students 
in
 the
country, and 
they
 have
 depended
 on
 UP 
to
 provide
 them
 with
their 
next
 generation
 of
 PhD
 faculty
members.The
 number
of
high
 school 
seniors 
taking
 the
 yearly
 UP College
 Admission
 Test
 is 
increasing
 at
 an
 average
 rate of
 3.94%
 since
 August
2007.

 In
 the
 2012
 UPCAT,
 only
 one 
out
 of
 every
 13
applicants
qualified
 for
 admission
 into 
UP
Diliman
 –
 a
 majority
 of
 them
came
 from
 private
 (55.7%)
 and
 public
 science
 (29.4)
high
schools.

 A
 total
 of
 12,732 applicants
 were
 qualified 
for 
the
 entire
 UP 
System indicating
 a
 success
 rate
 of
 one
 in
5.83.

More 
than
 83,500
 high 
school
 seniors
 took
 the
 2013 UPCAT
‐ an
increase
 of
 8.95%
 than 
the
 number 
in
 2012.
 About
 65%
 of
 them
are
 competing
 for
 the 
3,875 
available
 slots 
(the 
same
 number
 as
in 
2012) 
that
 are
 distributed 
in
 the
 68
 undergraduate
 degree
programs
 offered 
by UP
 Diliman.
 Admission
 is
 getting 
more
difficult
 for
 SY
 2014‐2015.

Providing 
solid
 budgetary 
support
 to
 UP
 would
 allow
 it
 to
continue
 rationalizing
 public
 access
 to
 top‐quality
higher
education
 by 
young 
Filipinos
 from
 all
 over 
the
 country.

The
 additional
 funds
 would
 enable
 the
training
 of
 more 
talented
undergraduate
 students
 at a
 rate
 that
 is
 proportional
 to
 the
annual
 increase
 in
 the
 number 
of 
UPCAT
 applications. 
More
investments 
are
 also 
needed 
to
 enhance
 and
 strengthen
 the
academic
 and
 research
 programs
 in the 
other
 six
 constituent
universities
 (UPLB,
 UP
 Manila, 
UP
 Baguio, 
UP
 Visayas,
UP Mindanao,
 Open
 University) 
and 
reduce the
 relatively 
high
concentration 
of
 undergraduate
 and
 graduate
 students
(representing
 45% 
of
 all
 UP 
students)
 studying 
in
 UP
 Diliman.

As 
the leading 
university
 of 
the
 country
 in terms
 of
 research
productivity
 and
 breadth
 of academic
 programs,
UP 
is
 at
 the
forefront
 of
 on‐going efforts to
 harmonize
 and
 standardize
 the
academic
 degree
 programs
 that
 are
 offered
 by
 leading
 ASEAN
 universities 
in
 line with
 the 
implementation
 of
 the
ASEAN
Economic Community Blueprint
 in
 2015.
 UP
 should
 be
 provided
 with
 the
 means
 and
 resources
 necessary
 to 
become one 
of
 the 
truly
 great 
universities
 in
 the
 ASEAN.
 The
 success
 of
UP
 will
 mean greater
 opportunities
 of 
leadership 
for
 many
 more
 highly
 skilled Filipinos in
 this
 dynamic
 ASEAN
 region
 and 
the
 Pacific
 Rim.

Thank
you.

-----------------
About
 the
 author.
 Dr. Saloma
 is 
a professor
 of 
physics
 at 
the
National
 Institute
 of
 Physics,
UP
 Diliman.
He
 received
 the
Galileo
Galilei
 Award
 from
 the international
 Commission
 for
 Optics
 in
 2004
 and
 the
 triennial
 ASEAN Outstanding
 Scientist
 and
Technologist
 Award
 from
 the
 ASEAN
 Committee
on
 Science
and Technology
 in
 2008.
 He 
is
 included
 in
 the
 Ultimate
 List
 of
 15
Asian Scientists
 To
 Watch 
by
Asian
 Scientist
magazine 
(15
May 2011).
He 
is
 a
 member 
of
 the
 National
 Academy 
of 
Science 
and
Technology Philippines and
 a
 Senior
Member
 of
 the
 Optical
 Society
 of
 America.
 In
 August
 2011,
 he 
wrote
 an
 article
 entitled,
 “Why
 the
 Philippine
 Government Should
 Increase 
Its
Budget for
 the
 National
 University.

Manila Hotel Kapihan reveals that PDAF abolition is just the tip of the iceberg

By Chanda Shahani

Abolishing the pork barrel or the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) would not solve the systemic problems of corruption and mismanagement plaguing in the Philippines, an emerging consensus at a forum at the Manila Hotel, held last August 26, 2013, shows.

I went to this forum with my mother, former Senator Leticia R. Shahani; which was held on the same day as the million person march. "Come with me instead," my mom said, promising that I would gain more in sights than merely attending the medley of sit-ins held right outside the Manila Hoitel and in other venues. And so I did.

One of the organizers of the march, Rasti Delizo of Sanlakas, said that the march was one where the miuddle class was expected to take the lead. "People are outraged at the misuse of funds worth PhP 10 billion or more," he said, adding that the uniting line of thge various groups involved in the march was to scrap all pork barrel, and to hold all those guilty to account and to punish them.

The forum or kapihan  also revealed the following which, loosely, could be lumped under the general heading of  "pork barrel" or funds which fell under government discretionary spending:

• President's Social Fund, funded from Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) and Philippine Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) remittances.
• The Judicial Development Fund
• The Mampalaya Fund
• Local funds. For example, the Quezon City pork barrel is PhP 42 million a year.
• Internal Revenue Allotments of the local government units (LGUs).
• The intelligence fund of the President.
• Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF).

The forum was emceed by Manila Hotel President, former Senator Joey Lina. Atty. Lina said that the senators had PDAF or pork barrel of PhP 200 million a year, of which PhP 100 million had to go towards "hard" projects while PhP 100 million had to go towards "soft" projects. In the case of congressmen, they were alloted a total of PhP 70 million, of which PhP 40 million had to go towards "hard" projects while PhP 30 million had to go towards "soft" projects.

Sister Mary John Mananzan, one of the forum participants, said that rather than funding projects helter-skelter via PDAF, it was more important to use the money to fund "the most glaring" projects in order to solve these problems as quickly as possible. These areas were in housing and government hospitals.

Former Senator Leticia R. Shahani, a member of the Former Senior Government Officials (FSGO) a group made up of former high-ranking Philippine government officials,  said that the million person march was "a manifestation of the anger of the people."  She said that no matter what form of structure evolved to take the place of PDAF and other pork barrel funds, it was "useless," unless long-term attention was paid to changing the values and mindsets of people, because ways and means could be found again and again to sybvert the structure and filch money from the people.

Given that Philippine-style government is operating under a system with two houses of congress with one president given one six (6) year term; and with congress given the power of the budget, it would become apparent that congress is allowed (under the 1987 constitution) to approve items on the budget. Thus, in order to remove this glaring self-serving anomaly; the constitution itself has to be amended in order to reflect a system of government that is more attuned to the people's needs.

More on our system of government later.

PAHAYAG NG UPCSWCD: TANGGALIN ANG PORK BARREL NGAYON NA!

PAHAYAG NG UPCSWCD
22 Agosto 2013

TANGGALIN ANG PORK BARREL NGAYON NA!
PONDOHAN ANG MGA BATAYANG SERBISYONG PANLIPUNAN!

Nakikiisa ang Kolehiyo ng Gawaing Panlipunan at Pagpapaunlad ng Pamayanan (CSWCD) ng Unibersidad ng Pilipinas (UP) sa mga miyembro ng faculty, staff, estudyante at alumni ng UP na mariing nagkokondena sa walang pakundangang paglulustay ng pera ng bayan sa mga bogus na NGO at proyekto gaya ng ipinahihiwatig ng tinatawag na P10-bilyong Napoles scam. Bilyun-bilyong piso ang inilalaan sa Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) ng mga senador at congressmen ngunit walang linaw kung paano ito nagagasta kayat nagiging oportunidad para sa walang habas na pandaraya at pandarambong.

Mayroon din ibang malalaking pondo na ang tawag ay lump sum appropriation ng mga ahensiya ng gobyerno, kasama na ang ehekutibo, na hindi alam kung ano at saan ang pupuntahan.

Ang ganitong sitwasyon ay tunay na nakakapanlumo, nakakaiyak at nakakagalit lalo na sa konteksto ng laganap na kagutuman at kasalatan ng mahihirap na Pilipino. Ngayon ay dagdag pang hagupit ang pananalanta ng mga bagyo at pagbaha.

Sa harap ng ganitong kalagayan ay malinaw ang tuwid na landas na dapat tahakin ng lahat ng mamamayang Pilipinong may malasakit sa Inang Bayan. Di dapat palampasin ang tahasang pagtalikod sa matitinding pangangailangan ng ating mga kababayan at garapal na paglustay ng pondong dapat sila ang nakinabang.

Dapat imbestigahan at parusahan ang lahat ng maysala!
Dapat suportahan ang panukalang batas para sa pagtatanggal ng sistemang pork barrel! Isabay na rin dito ang pagtatanggal ng lump sum appropriation ng lahat ng ahensiya ng gobyerno!

Dapat gamitin ang pondong nakalaan sa pork barrel (P25.4 bilyon para sa taong 2014) at sa mga lump sum appropriation sa mga batayang serbisyong panlipunan para sa kalusugan, edukasyon, pabahay, mass transport, imprastruktura sa kanayunan, at reporma sa lupa!

Lumahok tayo sa sama-samang pagkilos ng pamayanan ng UP at sa pamayanang binubuo ng lahat ng mga Pilipinong naghahangad ng isang malinis na pamahalaang nananagot sa lahat ng kanyang gawain at gastusin, at tumutugon sa mga pangangailangan at hinaing ng mga maralita at nasasantabi sa lipunan.

U.P. Diliman: Remembering 32 journalists killed in Maguindanao

By Chanda Shahani

Last August 23, 2013, Cyd Godinez and I went ot to the College of Mass Communication at U.P. Diliman to attend the commemoration of the November 23, 2009 massacre in Maguindanao where some 32 journalists died, out of a total of 58 victims.

On hand were the faculty and students of the College of Mass Communication, headed by CMC Dean Roland Tolentino. There were some talks, and then candles were lit to commemorate the victims. 

Coming before the August 26, 2013 million person march to Quirino Grandstand to protest the existence of the priority development assistance fund (PDAF) or pork barrel resulting in losses of at least PhP 10 billion to the Filipino people; Dean Tolentino and fellow CMC professor, Danilo Arao, collectively made the point that PDAF was an egregious instance of the misuse of government resources towards unethical ends. On the other hand, the machinery of the local government: local police, personnel, even a backhoe were used to massacre 32 journalists and other people. These assets employed were paid for with the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) of the local government units (LGUs).

In other words, even IRAs are subject to abuse, and even IRAs, PDAFs should be looked into and be subjected to oversight and inspection so that abuses of such horrendous proportions can never be repeated again.

In both instances - that of the PDAF and that of the Maguindanao massacre - presidential patronage allowed actors to act with impunity. In the case of the Ampatuans, who delivered valuable votes to former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in Maguindanao, and are still seen as political assets to the President benigno S. Aquino III, the trial seems to drag on with an ever elusive sense of justice for the families and friends of those who died in Maguindanao. 

Dean Tolentino called for the abolition of the Presidential and Congressional pork barrel.He urged those who attended the commemoration of the murder of 58 people, to attend the million person march towards Quirino Grandstand and other points of Metro Manila and throughout the Philippines to march with the PDAF in mind, and the Maguindanao massacre in mind.

"Makibaka tayo at huwag tayong matakot," Dean Tolentino reminded his audience.

At issue regarding the IRAs, it turns out is that the IRAs reflect the same kind of greed for resources and power that are reflected in the presidential and congressional pork barrels, said Danilo Arao, a professor of journalism at the CMC.

Arao also urged journalism students to stick to the time honored University of the Philippines ideals of honor and excellence as part of their public service as working journalists; which included letting concealed information come out to be scrutinized by the public. 

He also said that other issues that need to be kept on the front burner through activism were:

• Justice for the Maguindanao massacre victims and other victims of extra judicial killings.
• The retention of freedom of speech.
• Stop the killing of journalists

Arao said that the high survey satisfaction ratings of President Benigno S. Aquino III were not an excuse to collectively make the public's heads spin with distorted information related to PDAF ore pork barrel, which he said might simply be given a new name.

Noynoy PDAF `abolition’ misleading, protests to continue – UP community

PRESS RELEASE
August 24, 2013

Noynoy PDAF `abolition’ misleading, protests to continue – UP community

Concerned students, faculty, staff and residents of the University of the Philippines denounced the misleading announcement of President Noynoy Aquino as regards the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF).

In a press conference last August 23, Aquino said that it is now time to “abolish” PDAF and put in place a new mechanism to meet the needs of the people. Members of the Senate and the House of Representatves can still recommend projects but they will have to go through the process of finalizing the national budget.

The concerned UP community members said that Aquino’s policy pronouncement is just a “sugar-coated reform of the inherently flawed pork barrel system.”

In a statement, they stressed that the PDAF will just be repackaged, “such that the Congress will be at the behest of the Department of Budget and Management and the Office of the President.”

They called for the “just distribution and rechanneling of funds to basic social services, NOT a rehashed pork barrel system that is even more vulnerable to corruption. These funds must be allocated through public agencies such as public hospitals, state universities and colleges, public schools, salary upgrading of teachers and government workers, etc. The skewed regional allocations in the proposed budget must be realigned, with sufficient allocations for neglected regions in the Visayas and in Mindanao.”

In this context, they stressed the need for people to rage against “unbridled corruption” in government. “On August 26, we shall march from Liwasang Bonifacio to Rizal Park to Mendiola to decisively assert our resolve to abolish the presidential and congressional pork barrel and rechannel funds to basic social services!”

The statement was signed by the UP Faculty for the Abolition of the Presidential and Congressional Pork Barrel System, UP Kilos Na, Multi-Sectoral Alliance, Office of the Student Regent, Office of the Staff Regent and the University Student Council.

For verification and more information, please call Prof. Sarah Raymundo at (0939) 925-9368

STATEMENT

Marching On: UP Community for the Abolition of the Presidential and Congressional Pork Barrel System

We, the University of the Philippines community, strongly condemn the deceitful and misleading announcement of President Aquino to “abolish” the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) and to institute, in its place, a supposedly “new” mechanism for allocation. This is a clear attempt to pacify and diffuse the just anger of the people and their clamor for the abolition of the pork barrel system and the rechanneling of funds to basic social services. In fact, PNoy’s proposal is by no means an abolition of the PDAF; rather, it is a sugarcoated reform of the inherently flawed pork barrel system. It drowns the more substantive problems of graft and corruption and patronage politics that result from this system. Worse, it conveniently leaves the president’s Special Purpose Funds, amounting to at least 310.1B, untouched, even increasing his discretionary power in the management of national funds.

In PNoy’s proposal, the congressional pork barrel (PDAF) will merely be repackaged, such that the Congress will continue to be at the behest of the Department of Budget and Management and the Office of the President. In the guise of transparency, the proposal actually places the PDAF under the stricter and more direct control of the President, making legislators more beholden to Malacanang. This farce is by no means an “abolition” but a perpetuation of the pork barrel system: it fortifies patronage politics both at the presidential and local levels, and violates constitutional principles by blurring the lines between the executive and legislative functions of government.

We are calling for just distribution and rechanneling of funds to basic social services, NOT a rehashed pork barrel system that is even more vulnerable to corruption. These funds must be allocated through public agencies such as public hospitals, state universities and colleges, public schools, salary upgrading of teachers and government workers, etc. The skewed regional allocations in the proposed budget must be realigned, with sufficient allocations for neglected regions in the Visayas and in Mindanao.

Let not the deceitful machinations of the PNoy Administration dampen our rage against unbridled corruption in government and attacks on our right to social services. On National Heroes Day, we shall continue the legacy of our heroes in upholding the people’s interests against the rich and the few who secure seats in government and reduce the national agenda to their own selfish interests. On August 26, we shall march from Liwasang Bonifacio to Rizal Park to Mendiola to decisively assert our resolve to abolish the presidential and congressional pork barrel and rechannel funds to basic social services!

Join the August 26 March from Liwasang Bonifacio to Luneta to Mendiola: 7AM mass-up at Quezon Hall, UP Diliman; 9AM meet-up at Liwasang Bonifacio and march to Rizal Park.

UP CMC calls for abolition of pork barrel, investigation of corruption, arrest of plunderers

N.B. – This is the official statement of the UP College of Mass Communication on the pork barrel issue, signed by 29 faculty members and 14 staff led by Dean Roland Tolentino and former deans Luis Teodoro and Georgina Encanto.

Statement of the University of the Philippines
College of Mass Communication
August 23, 2013

THE FACULTY, students and staff of the University of the Philippines College of Mass Communication (UP CMC) will join the people’s assembly and march at the Luneta on Monday, August 26 to express our collective outrage. We demand the abolition of the pork barrel system; the immediate arrest of, and the filing of appropriate charges of plunder and other high crimes against those involved in the P10-billion pork barrel scam from both the private and public sector; and a thorough and non-partisan investigation into the entire system of which the scam is only a small part of the estimated P250 billion lost to corruption in the public sector.

Together with the rest of the Filipino people, UP and its constituents, as well as the other state universities and colleges, are among the victims of the corruption that has metastasized throughout officialdom as well as the private sector. While our budgets are being reduced to the detriment of our mandates to train those among our young men and women with the most potential to serve this country and its people, billions are funnelled annually into the pockets of scoundrels and thieves both in and out of government so they may indulge their greed for fleets of luxury cars, palatial homes, and shopping binges abroad.

This is a horrendous crime for which those guilty of it should be penalized. President Benigno Aquino III should first of all forthwith cause the withdrawal from the 2014 General Appropriations Act of the P27 billion in pork barrel funds for Congress, selected agencies, and his own office the Department of Budget and Management has appropriated. He should immediately organize an investigative body credible enough to look into the extent to which not only pork barrel but also other funds have been and are being misused, while ordering the Department of Justice to file the appropriate charges of plunder against those involved in the P10-billion pork barrel scam.

President Aquino’s “bosses” have spoken. His defense of the pork barrel and his insistence on keeping the system intact despite widespread outrage and opposition of the Filipino people are unacceptable. These are completely at odds with the people’s sentiments and the objective interest in seeing to it that taxes are well-spent for the people’s own benefit rather than that of a handful of rapacious individuals whose greed knows no limit.

COLLEGE OFFICIALS
Dr. Roland B. Tolentino, Dean
Prof. Danilo A. Arao, Associate Dean
Prof. Randy Jay C. Solis, College Secretary

Dr. Georgina R. Encanto, Former Dean
Prof. Luis V. Teodoro, Former Dean

Prof. Jane O. Vinculado, Chair, Broadcast Communication Department
Prof. Lucia P. Tangi, Officer-in-Charge, Journalism Department
Prof. Patrick F. Campos, Director of Office of Extension and External Relations

FACULTY
Broadcast Communication Department
Dr. Elizabeth L. Enriquez
Dr. Perlita G. Manalili
Prof. Rosa Maria T. Feliciano
Prof. Victor C. Avecilla
Prof. Josefina C. Santos, DZUP Radio Station Manager
Prof. Fernando A. Austria, Jr.
Ms. Ma. Ivy A. Claudio

Communication Research Department
Prof. Jacques Rusanna Yves DM. Gimeno

Journalism Department
Prof. Evelyn Katigbak
Prof. Ma. Diosa Labiste
Ms. Teresa Congjuico

UP Film Institute
Prof. Shirley P. Evidente, Faculty Coordinator for Academic Programs and Research, UPFI
Prof. Eduardo J. Lejano, Jr., Faculty Coordinator for Film, Theater and Extension Services
Prof. Jose C. Gutierrez III, College Webmaster
Mr. Roy C. Iglesias

LECTURERS
Broadcast Communication Department
Prof. Melba S. Estonilo
Prof. Marinela M. Aseron
Mr. Dexter Mantes

UP Film Institute
Maria Lourdes De Guzman
Carlo Gabriel Pangilinan
Bryan Quesada

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF AND REPS
Gina Villegas
Marianita P. Cinco
Rosalita S. Burlat
Armando H. Hirao
Nemesio B. Faulan
Clarissa S. Concepcion
Raquelita Bacarra
Jacqueline Manalo
Teresita Santos
Irene Sia
Hermana Dela Paz
Ma. Christine Hernandez
Jam Tolentino
Janette Pamaylaon

CMC Student Council (composed of 13 elected student leaders)

U.P. Professor shoots a student dead: Remembering a death

Photograph by: Chanda R. Shahani

With demand for reforms intensified and student activism was defined by frequent altercations with authorities, the atmosphere within the University of the Philippines Diliman was chaotic to some extent. One must note however that at this point in UP’s history, students were rallying because of gasoline prices.

Student organizations, at the time, were actively involved with issues concerning the Philippines and were often very enthusiastic about their advocacies. UP later on came to be known for its activism whatever issue it may be.

 It was February 1, 1971 when students decided to do a massive human blockade to keep vehicles from entering the university. By 9 AM student leaders started rallying their fellow students to join the protest and a few hours later, the UP Security Force arrived at the scene acting on complaints from professors and residents of the area. As one can imagine there was a scuffle right at the University Avenue with students behind pillboxes and in a heated argument with university security.

Although activism at the time was not only popular but necessary, there were still those with dissenting opinion and those who did not want to involve themselves in the protests. One of these people is a professor of the Mathematics Department. Prof. Inocente Campos is known for his eccentricities and is infamous among students because he kept on ignoring boycotts –on three occasions to be exact.

The professor tangled with student activists who wanted to go inside his classroom to persuade the class in joining the respective rallies. In one occasion, Prof. Campos fired three warning shots to drive away student activists out of his classroom. Despite his rather eccentric nature, there is no question that Prof. Campos is a dedicated teacher. In fact, he believed that teaching was a sacred responsibility as well as a public duty.

On that day, the professor was on his way to the university to conduct a class since the University Secretary’s office did not suspend classes. Upon entering the first checkpoint, the professor slowed down but he was not blocked by the students. However, someone recognized him and soon, students started throwing pillboxes at his car. He continued driving but one of the tires was damaged and his car stopped. By then, students advanced toward the teacher as he got out of the car.

According to records, he put on his vest and took his shotgun from the back seat then tried to fire it to scare the activists. The gun however was jammed so the professor took out his .22 caliber rifle and started shooting. He did not stop firing and at the heat of the moment drew his revolver and fired more shots. Minutes after the shooting, Prof. Campos was arrested by the police and brought to the Quezon City police station.

As a result of this untoward incident, a student by the name of Pastor “Sonny” Mesina Jr. was seriously wounded. He was rushed to the UP Infirmary and was later transferred to the Veterans’ Memorial Hospital located just a few minutes away from the university. He however did not survive and died four days later.

It is important to note that while many of Mesina’s peers were both angered and saddened by the incident, his death became a crucial factor in latter developments because it turned the protests for gasoline price increase into a massive protest against military intrusion. Pastor Mesina Jr.’s may not be remembered by many but the plaque in remembrance of the student can still be seen today. The plaque was placed right where he fell when he was shot by the irate professor.

Because of the rich history of the university, many incidents are no longer remembered but many of Mesina’s peers will always have a vivid picture of the shooting.